
Our Verdict
Samsung’s first proper PCIe 5.0 SSD keeps cool without a ridiculously oversized heatsink contraption, and it’s the fastest drive we’ve ever tested in some tests as well, particularly on game loads. You don’t always see that extra speed benefit, though, and you can get similar performance for less money elsewhere.
- Amazing performance
- Runs cool with small heatsink
- Decent supporting software
- High price at MSRP
- Not always faster than competition
Samsung has turned up fashionably late to the PCIe 5.0 SSD party, but it’s largely been worth the wait. Rather than rushing out a new drive as soon as the first motherboards came on the scene, the company has been able to see where other drives have failed, and refine its PCIe 5.0 SSD formula. Meet the Samsung 9100 Pro, the fastest SSD on the block.
This new Samsung drive isn’t just the quickest M.2 SSD I’ve ever tested, but it also doesn’t run ridiculously hot. You still need a heatsink for it, but not a comically oversized one with a fan in it. In fact, the slimline cooler attached to the heatsink versions of the drive has no trouble keeping it in check without throttling. It might not be cheap (more on that later), but in terms of nailing the brief, the Samsung 9100 Pro is the best SSD for gaming in terms of raw performance.
I’ve tested two of the new drives to see how they get on in a number of different scenarios, from gaming to raw sequential performance, and using one of them as the main drive in my gaming PC for a couple of weeks. The first is a 2TB model with a heatsink, and the second is a 4TB drive without a heatsink.
Why you can trust our advice ✔ At PCGamesN, our experts spend hours testing hardware and reviewing games and VPNs. We share honest, unbiased opinions to help you buy the best. Find out how we test.
Specs
Samsung 9100 Pro | |
Interface | 4x PCIe 5.0 |
Capacities | 1TB, 2TB, 4TB, 8TB |
Controller | Samsung in-house |
Form factor | M.2 2280 |
Heatsink | Optional |
Max seq read speed | 14,700MB/s (1TB and 2TB) 14,800MB/s (4TB and 8TB) |
Max seq write speed | 13,300MB/s (1TB) 13,400MB/s (2TB, 4TB, 8TB) |
NAND | Samsung V NAND TLC (V8) |
Cache | 1GB LPDDR4X (1TB), 2GB LPDDR4X (2TB), 4GB LPDDR4X (4TB), 8GB LPDDR4X (8TB) |
Endurance rating (TBW) | 600 (1TB), 1,200 (2TB), 2,400 (4TB), 4,800 (8TB) |
Warranty | Five years |
Thanks to its use of the 4x PCIe 5.0 interface, the performance of the Samsung 9100 Pro is well ahead of the company’s last-gen PCIe 4.0 drives, such as the Samsung 990 Pro. Technically, this isn’t the company’s first PCIe 5.0 drive either, as the Samsung 990 Evo and Evo Plus ostensibly used this interface too.
Software
How we test
To assess SSD performance, I run a mix of synthetic tests using CrystalDiskMark and AS SSD, to gauge peak sequential and random performance. I also run the PCMark 10 full system drive benchmark to get an idea of real-world performance as a system drive, and run the 3DMark storage benchmark to assess gaming performance, which is the priority for our reviews as a gaming site.
The latter runs traces from real games, including Battlefield V, The Outer Wilds, and Overwatch, to measure performance for game installs, saves, and loading times. All the SSDs in the graphs below were tested on the same test rig, which has the spec listed below. All tests are conducted in a full PC build inside a Cooler Master MasterCase H500P case with two 200mm front intake fans and one 140mm exhaust fan, with the glass side panel attached, to get a realistic idea of thermal performance and throttling.
- CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- CPU cooler: Corsair H100X Elite
- Motherboard: MSI X870E Carbon WiFi
- RAM: G.Skill TridentZ RGB 6,000MT/s, CL28
- GPU: Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080
- SSD (system drive): WD Black SN850X heatsink 2TB
- PSU: Corsair RMX1000 Shift
Benchmarks
On to the big question, then. Can the Samsung 9100 Pro really live up to its manufacturer’s claims when it comes to performance? Let’s start with those sky-high sequential read speed claims, of 14,700MB/s for the 2TB drive and 14,800MB/s for the 4TB drive. To put this to the test, I ran CrystalDiskMark on both drives, and while neither test quite hit Samsung’s claims, they weren’t far off, and are significantly higher than the Crucial T705.
As you can see in the graph above, the 4TB drive hits 14,725MB/s, and the 2TB drive can manage 14,645MB/s. These are huge numbers that really see Samsung pushing the limit of what’s possible with the PCIe 5.0 interface, but it’s always worth bearing in mind that you’ll only see this performance in large-scale file transfers. The graph above makes it look as though the Samsung 9100 Pro is well over double the speed of the WD Black SN850X, but this is the only scenario where you’ll see that scale of performance difference.
Sequential write speeds are also solid for the Samsung drives. The 2TB drive hits 13,450MB/s in this test, with a similar (though ever so slightly lower) result for the 4TB drive, being well ahead of the 12,718MB/s achieved by the Crucial T705. Samsung has absolutely nailed the raw performance of this drive when it comes to sequential reads and writes.
Random read performance is also a strong point for the Samsung 9100 Pro, as shown in our AS SSD test 4K 64-queue-depth results, where the 9100 Pro tops out at 979,640 IOPS, compared to 889,149 IOPS for the Corsair MP700 Pro and 882,724 IOPS for the Crucial T705.
This test does show how the waters get muddied once you get away from sequential performance, though, as both the Corsair and Crucial drives are a little quicker than the Samsung when it comes to random writes. While the PCIe 4.0 WD Black SN850X is at the bottom of the graph in this test, you can also see that it’s not anywhere near as far behind as it is in the sequential tests, showing that these flagship figures don’t tell you the whole story.
Indeed, switching to the CrystalDiskMark random 4K (32-queue-depth) tests reverses the picture, with the WD Black SN850X being slightly quicker than all the PCIe 5.0 drives on test, and the Samsung 9100 Pro sitting at the bottom of the graphs. The differences are small across the board here, though. Basically, buying a new PCIe 5.0 SSD doesn’t guarantee you a performance boost in every single scenario.
Moving onto the all-important game tests shows where the Samsung 9100 Pro is really strong, which is when it comes to game load times. When loading Battlefield V it hits a fantastic speed of 1,526MB/s, compared to 1,404MB/s for the Crucial T705 and 1,216 for the Corsair MP700 Pro.
Likewise, in Overwatch, the Samsung 9100 Pro again sits at the top of the graphs, loading the game at 571MB/s, quicker than any of the other PCIe 5.0 drives on test, and well ahead of the 407MB/s from the WD Black SN850X. One factor to consider with the latter drive is also that WD has sadly now discontinued its WD Dashboard software, which enabled you to switch on WD’s Game Mode to improve load times. Even then, though, the load times we recorded with the old Game Mode enabled (1,154MB/s in Battlefield v) are well behind the Samsung 9100 Pro.
Interestingly, though, the Samsung 9100 Pro fares less well in the install test for The Outer Wilds, where it hit 236MB/s. It’s still quicker than the WD Black SN850X here, but the Corsair and Crucial drives are a fair bit quicker, with the T705 even running at 290MB/s.
The traces for this game told a similar story when it comes to saving your game in The Outer Wilds, where the Samsung 9100 Pro’s 178MB/s result is again ahead of the WD Black SN850X, but falls behind the other two PCIe 5.0 drives on test. This just goes to show that those peak sequential figures on the box don’t always tell you the whole story when it comes to real-world gaming performance.
Finally, we come to the PCMark full system drive test, which sees the Samsung 9100 Pro return to the throne, averaging 637MB/s across the system drive tests. That’s faster than the other two PCIe 5.0 SSDs, by 90MB/s in the case of the Corsair MP700 Pro, and it’s well in front of the 404MB/s from the WD Black SN850X.
Similarly, the average access time of 39μs is a great result for the Samsung 9100 Pro in this test, being well ahead of the WD Black SN850X, and a little in front of the other PCIe 5.0 SSDs. This is a snappy SSD to use as a Windows system drive, although it’s also worth noting that all these figures are incredibly small.
Temperature
Price
Alternatives
Crucial T705
Read our full Crucial T705 review.
WD Black SN850X
Read our full WD Black SN850X review.