Supreme Court Seems Ready to Reject Limit on Excessive-Force Suits Against Police Officers


The Supreme Court seemed poised on Wednesday to reject a legal theory that puts tight limits on lawsuits seeking to hold police officers accountable for using deadly force.

The case arose, an appeals court judge wrote, from a commonplace occurrence. “A routine traffic stop,” the judge wrote, “has again ended in the death of an unarmed Black man.”

The question for the justices was how closely courts should confine their consideration to “the moment of threat” rather than the larger context of the encounter.

There was something like consensus that the theory was focused too narrowly on the seconds preceding a shooting.

“Everybody agrees it’s wrong,” Justice Neil M. Gorsuch said. “What’s the harm of saying that?”

The case started on an April afternoon in 2016, when Ashtian Barnes, 24, was driving on a highway outside Houston in a car his girlfriend had rented. He was on his way to pick up her daughter from day care.

Though Mr. Barnes did not know it, the car’s license plate was linked to unpaid tolls that had been incurred by another driver. Office Roberto Felix Jr. of the Harris County Constable’s Office pulled the car over based on those unpaid tolls.

When Mr. Barnes could not immediately locate his license and the car’s registration, the officer asked him to step out of the car. Instead, Mr. Barnes began to pull away, with the car door still open. Officer Felix drew his gun, jumped onto the moving car’s door sill and twice shot Mr. Barnes, as recorded on dash cam footage.

Ashtian Barnes was killed in a police shooting in 2016. He was unarmed.Credit…Adam Fomby, via Reuters

Mr. Barnes’s mother, Janice Hughes Barnes, sued, saying the officer’s use of force was unreasonable, violating the Fourth Amendment.

A unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled last year in favor of the officer on what it said was a narrow question. “We may only ask whether Officer Felix was in danger ‘at the moment of the threat’ that caused him to use deadly force against Barnes,” Judge Patrick E. Higginbotham wrote.

Judge Higginbotham added a concurring opinion, writing only for himself. Had he been allowed to consider all of the circumstances surrounding the stop, he wrote, he could have ruled the other way.

“Given the rapid sequence of events and Officer Felix’s role in drawing his weapon and jumping on the running board,” the judge wrote, “the totality of the circumstances merits finding that Officer Felix violated Barnes’s Fourth Amendment right to be free from excessive force.”

At Wednesday’s argument in the case, Barnes v. Felix, No. 23-1239, some justices expressed concerns about second-guessing police officers’ split-second judgments. “An officer does not get the time we’ve spent here today to make the decision,” Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh said.

But most of the justices seemed inclined to allow the court to consider more than the seconds before the shooting.

“Would you be satisfied,” Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. asked a lawyer for Ms. Barnes, “with a narrow holding that it is wrong for a court to look just at the moment of the threat?”

The lawyer, Nathaniel A.G. Zelinsky, said he would, though he added that “it would be helpful if the court makes clear that that means that you can look at the jump in addition to the shoot.”

Charles L. McCloud, a lawyer for Officer Felix, said the court should narrow its focus to the moment he used force. “He was clinging to the side of a fleeing suspect’s car, and Felix reasonably believed that his life was in imminent danger,” Mr. McCloud said. “That conclusion should end this case.”

In rebuttal, Mr. Zelinsky disagreed. “You have to look at the whole picture,” he said, “and here that’s more than just two seconds.”

Umair

Muhammad Umair is a passionate content creator, web developer, and tech enthusiast. With years of experience in developing dynamic websites and curating engaging content, he specializes in delivering accurate, informative, and up-to-date articles across diverse topics. From gaming and technology to crypto and world news, Umair's expertise ensures a seamless blend of technical knowledge and captivating storytelling. When he's not writing or coding, he enjoys gaming and exploring the latest trends in the tech world.

Related Posts

Ecuador’s Presidential Election: What to Know

Daniel Noboa, Ecuador’s center-right president, is facing re-election after 15 months in office. His predecessor, Guillermo Lasso, called for early elections in 2023 amid impeachment proceedings over embezzlement accusations. Mr.…

Federal Financial Watchdog Ordered to Cease Activity

Employees of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau were instructed to cease “all supervision and examination activity” and “all stakeholder engagement,” effectively stopping the agency’s operations, in an email from the…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You Missed

Crypto Scammers Target Tanzanian Billionaire’s Followers, Net $1.48M

  • By Umair
  • February 9, 2025
  • 1 views
Crypto Scammers Target Tanzanian Billionaire’s Followers, Net $1.48M

‘Last large fintech in the world’ Klarna to embrace crypto amid upcoming IPO

  • By Umair
  • February 9, 2025
  • 3 views
‘Last large fintech in the world’ Klarna to embrace crypto amid upcoming IPO

Swedish Fintech Giant Klarna Explores Crypto Integration Amid Industry Shift 

  • By Umair
  • February 9, 2025
  • 4 views
Swedish Fintech Giant Klarna Explores Crypto Integration Amid Industry Shift 

Reese Witherspoon is ‘available’ for NFL’s ‘Chiefs, Eagles’

  • By Umair
  • February 9, 2025
  • 3 views
Reese Witherspoon is ‘available’ for NFL’s ‘Chiefs, Eagles’

Trump says he will announce new tariffs on aluminum, steel imports on Monday

  • By Umair
  • February 9, 2025
  • 1 views
Trump says he will announce new tariffs on aluminum, steel imports on Monday

XRP futures open interest drops 37% — Are altcoin traders jumping ship?

  • By Umair
  • February 9, 2025
  • 3 views